AquariumBoard Forums

Welcome to the AquariumBoard Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Go Back   AquariumBoard Forums > Freshwater > Freshwater Products & DIY
Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Photo Gallery Referrer Statistics FlashChat FAQ Weekly Stats Calendar

Freshwater Products & DIY Lighting, Plumbing, Heating -- Gear that supports the system

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-17-2008, 07:50 PM   #1 (permalink)
joephys
Registered User
 
joephys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: auburn, wa
Posts: 4,378
Default play sand and fish

In doing a little research, I found the MSDS Solutions - Free material safety data sheets from 3E Company for play sand that is often suggested for use in aquariums. It is quartz based so it doesn't have a negative effect on water quality, but according to the MSDS, it does have fine dust that is a carcinogen to humans. (Nice that its recommended for children's sand boxes, but thats a different forum)

Basically the extremely small particles will dig into lung tissues. I am wondering what kind of effect these small particles can have on fish (yes I know fish don't have lungs).

I know there are going to be a lot of replies with people saying that they have used it with no problems, but how can one be sure that there truly weren't any problems as a result from the dust? Just like not all people won't get cancer from being around the sand, all fishes wouldn't have problems from it. The average hobbiest wouldn't have any way to know if long term effects are from the dust or something else.

I guess there is probably only a small handful of people that would have any real scientific insight into this, but I thought it was worth bringing up.
joephys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 08:42 PM   #2 (permalink)
OrionGirl
Miss you, Old Man
 
OrionGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: California coastline
Posts: 6,690
Default

a) that's based on continuous exposure to dry sand. Wet sand is highly unlikely to get into lungs unless you're snorting mucky water, in which case the water is probably going to cause more serious problems than the sand.

b) There are some fish that will not appreciate sand with small particles with sharp edges. Fish that dig, for example kuhli loaches and smooth skinned eels don't like sharp sand. But that's nothing to do with cancer.

In truth--providing enough space, appropriate foods, and clean water are all higher concerns for me than avoiding something with a slim chance of causing lung cancer in a fish.
__________________
~Sheila
tempus edax rerum

Ideas do not have to be correct in order to be good; its only necessary that, if they do fail, they do so in an interesting way. ~Robert Rosen
OrionGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 09:08 PM   #3 (permalink)
joephys
Registered User
 
joephys's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: auburn, wa
Posts: 4,378
Default

My point wasn't about lung cancer in people.

The point was that the small particles can 'dig' into sensitive flesh. My question was how those small particles effect the flesh in fish. I know that when wet it isn't going to be an issue for fish that stay off the bottom, my concern is with bottom feeders.
joephys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 06:30 AM   #4 (permalink)
RTR
RTR
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Exurban MD, USA
Posts: 838
Default

If you pre-rinse the sand (of any sort) as is normally done, the fines are in the driveway (hopefully not down you drains). Then the potential problem is either reduced or non-existent, depending on how well the task was done.

It is an artificial issue for aquaria IMHO.
__________________
Where's the fish? - Neptune
RTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 08:52 AM   #5 (permalink)
DaisyTattoo
It's a girl
 
DaisyTattoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Peoria, Illinois
Posts: 3,032
Default

I keep play sand in a tank that has horseface loaches...which bury themselves in the sand and I have yet to see any ill effects. Shoot....they even eat by passing the sand thru their gills (sifting) and have had no red gills or other issues. BOME I would say it is safe.
__________________
It's not easy being a mother. If it were, fathers would do it.

Last edited by DaisyTattoo : 05-18-2008 at 08:54 AM.
DaisyTattoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 10:10 AM   #6 (permalink)
mostlycichlids
Mostly Cichlids
 
mostlycichlids's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Georgetown, Colorado
Posts: 1,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaisyTattoo View Post
I keep play sand in a tank that has horseface loaches...which bury themselves in the sand and I have yet to see any ill effects. Shoot....they even eat by passing the sand thru their gills (sifting) and have had no red gills or other issues. BOME I would say it is safe.
Don't you mean BOOM! LOl!
__________________
Don't take it personal, Just roll with it!

MY FORUM:
www.freshwatermadness.darkbb.com
mostlycichlids is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 01:34 PM   #7 (permalink)
rosita
. . . . . . . . .
 
rosita's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cape Fear River Basin
Posts: 2,047
Default

lol Boom makes more sense to me; never seen BOME~~~?
__________________
If it won't for bad luck, I'd have no luck at all . . .
rosita is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 02:32 PM   #8 (permalink)
DaisyTattoo
It's a girl
 
DaisyTattoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Peoria, Illinois
Posts: 3,032
Default

based on my experience
__________________
It's not easy being a mother. If it were, fathers would do it.
DaisyTattoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 04:19 PM   #9 (permalink)
Roan
Baroness von Bowhead
 
Roan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Herdon, VA
Posts: 436
Default

And so BOME it is!

Roan
__________________
Rainbowfish: Know your streams and keep them clean!
Got rainbowfish? We do! http://Bowheads.org/forums/
Bowheads! No bull, just bows. It's about bows by the bowheads who keep them.
Roan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 05:06 PM   #10 (permalink)
Rallysman
Registered User
 
Rallysman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 469
Default

I just skip the play sand and go to pool filter sand. I don't know if play sand will harm the fish, but it's so fine it looks like mud IMO.
Rallysman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2008, 05:37 AM   #11 (permalink)
beviking
resU deretsigeR
 
beviking's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 446
Default

Natural order of sediment is that finer particles settle and larger particles do not. Mix sand with coarse gravel and the sand settles underneath the gravel. If the particles are fine enough to be suspended, hopefully your filter will pull them out of the water column. In theory it shouldn't be a concern, but like most things concerning our aquaria, we tend to overthink them BOME it isn't an issue either

beviking is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29 AM.

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
Page generated in 0.23601 seconds with 10 queries